In 1885, Ulysses S Grant died a hero.
Revered in the north for his victories against the Confederacy in the
American civil war, he was respected in the south for his generosity
towards disbanded rebels, whom he permitted to return home in peace
after their commanders’ surrender.
Following the assassination
of Abraham Lincoln, Grant became the face of the Republican party,
and was twice elected president, serving from 1869 to 1877. His
administration was mired in financial scandal, but out of office
Grant restored his reputation, travelling the world as an unofficial
ambassador.
At the end of his life, bankrupt after a bad investment
and dying in agony of throat cancer, he recaptured people’s
imagination, finishing the manuscript of his memoirs just before his
death.
Since then, however, as Ron Chernow
argues in his new biography, Grant has suffered in public memory. His
drinking – notorious in his lifetime – dominates his legacy,
while his achievements as a soldier and as a politician have been
dismissed.
A generation of white southerners cast General Grant as a
dullard and a butcher, victorious only because of overwhelming
material advantage. In this “Lost Cause” myth, President Grant is
carpetbagger-in-chief, imposing brutal military government on
“innocent” southern whites.
To historians of the Gilded Age,
Grant as president was the creature of robber barons. And historians
of Reconstruction, Chernow complains, have assailed Grant from every
angle: he was too harsh with the south or too lenient; too quick to
send in the army or too quick to withdraw it.
This is biography by attrition. Across
nearly 1,000 pages, Chernow argues for his subject’s greatness.
Where contemporaries considered Grant’s drinking a moral failing,
Chernow paints his struggle with alcoholism as heroic.
The book
closes with a sketch of Mark Twain and William T Sherman reminiscing
(over drinks) after Grant’s funeral in New York City. Twain, who
published Grant’s memoirs, regretted not pushing him to include his
binges, vows of abstinence and falls from the wagon in the finished
book.
“Put the drunkenness in,” Twain said, “ – & the
repentance & reform. Trust the people.” Chernow takes Twain’s
regret to heart, offering a sensitive and nuanced account of a
talented man struggling with addiction, at a time when American
society was awash with alcohol, but pitiless towards alcoholics.
Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow
review – the man behind the musical
This acclaimed biography, which
inspired the award-winning hip-hop musical, salvages the reputation
of a Founding Father long accused of despoiling the innocence of the
US.
Against the claim that Grant was a
mediocre general, Chernow portrays him as a talented administrator.
He may have enjoyed a material advantage over the rebels, but he used
it decisively and skilfully, preventing Confederate forces from
prolonging the war.
In contrast to claims about Grant’s corruption
in office, Chernow casts him when president as a simple soldier,
loyal to his supporters and naive in trusting the wealthy civilians
who showered him with gifts. And during Reconstruction, Chernow
insists, Grant faced an impossible dilemma.
He could either pull
federal troops from the south and abandon African American citizens
to well-armed white supremacists, or keep his troops in place, and
risk losing control of the national government to the Democrats, who
would then take federal troops from the south.
Chernow, the author of acclaimed
biographies of George Washington and Alexander
Hamilton (the latter inspired Lin-Manuel Miranda’s
musical), is expert at explaining the friendships and antipathies of
elite American politics.
He is less nuanced when explaining the wider
social and economic forces at work in American life in the 19th
century. Grant was born in Point Pleasant, Ohio, across the Ohio
River from slave-holding Kentucky.
A Methodist and abolitionist, he
nonetheless married into a slaveholding family from Missouri. Chernow
describes antebellum America as “two incompatible worlds … the
enterprising free labour economy of the North and the regressive
world of southern slavery”. Grant’s father, Jesse Root Grant, is
portrayed as a colourful, boasting hustler, as against his
father-in-law, “Colonel” Dent, an unrepentant slaveholder and
Dixie buffoon, to symbolise the division between north and south. And
yet the Ohio Grants and the Missouri Dents were connected by an
economic and political system with a common interest in slave labour.
Jesse Grant was a successful tanner. Northern leather (along with
many other manufactured goods) was in high demand in the south;
southern cotton fuelled the textile mills of the north. The worlds of
slavery and freedom overlapped in more than personal relationships.
Buy This Book, CLICK BELOW:
Original review on: www.theguardian.com
No comments:
Post a Comment